articlecrossroad.com articlecrossroad.com
   Home Page :> About Us :> Privacy Policy :> ToS :> Add Your Link :> Submit Article
Search:   
Get Free Links
 
   

Garden & Home

   

Cooking & Drinking

   

Business & Services

   

Automobiles

   

Relationship & Lifestyle

   

Policies & Law

   

Finance & Banking

   

Education & Reference

   

Internet & Computers

   

Society & Issues

   

Self Enhancement

   

Sports & Adventure

   

Property & Agents

   

Technology & Science

   

Fitness & Health

   

Tour & Travel

   

Healthcare & Treatment

   

Issues & News

   

Jobs & Careers

   

Recreation

   

Culture & Art

   

Teens & Kids

   

Malls & Shopping

   

Online & Board Games

 

Home Page › Issues & News › Politics
 

Intellectual Property: The ECJ Extends the Use of Trade Marks to Goods and Services

 

Author: Rosanna Cooper

The European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled in Praktiker Bau- und Heimwerkermrkte (C 418/02) that a trade mark that is now in use by a company on its goods can be extended to cover the services provided by this company.

A DIY retailer Praktiker Mrkte, filed for registration with the Deutsches Patent und Markenamt (the German Patent and Trade Mark Office) of the mark PRAKTIKER in respect of the slogan 'retail trade in building, home improvement and gardening goods for the do-it-yourself sector.' However the German Patent Office refused registration of this slogan on the grounds that the concept of 'retail trade' did not denote independent services having autonomous economic significance.

Praktiker Mrkte brought an appeal before the Bundespatentgericht (Federal Patents Court) against the rejection of its application. The company argued that the economic trend towards a service society necessitated a re-appraisal of retail trade as a service. The consumer's purchasing decision would increasingly be influenced not only by the availability and price of a product, but also by other aspects such as the variety and assortment of goods, their presentation, the service provided by staff, advertising, image and the location of the store, etc. Such services provided in connection with retail trade enabled retailers to be distinguishable from their competitors. They further argued that such services ought to be eligible for protection by service marks.

The case was referred to the ECJ who concluded that:-

Retail services should be registered as trade marks if the services differ from the goods under which the trade mark is sold; and The contents of the services provided by the retailer must be specified so as to enable consumers to know in concrete terms (1) what the service consists of (expressions such as "retail trading" or "retail services" are not explicit enough) and (2) what goods or types of goods the services relates to.

Comment: This is a significant decision for trade mark owners.

If you require further information contact us.

Email: enquiries@rtcoopers.com

RT COOPERS, 2005. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances.

Author Bio:

Rosanna Cooper

Dr Rosanna Cooper BSc (Hons); CSci CChem MRSC; CChem FRSC; Dip Intellectual Property Law and Practice (Bristol), Solicitor; Attorney-at-Law (Grenada).

Dr Cooper is the managing partner of RT Coopers, Solicitors based in the City of London, England. She specialises in intellectual property (IP), biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, technology transfer and data protection. Dr Cooper was a partner in a West End firm in London and a senior lawyer with several City law firms before establishing RT Coopers. Dr Cooper studied for her Ph.D. in organic and medicinal chemistry at Kings College, University of London and pursued her postdoctoral research with SmithKline Beecham (now Glaxo SmithKline). She later worked as a senior pharmaceutical and paper chemist for Eli Lilly and Hercules respectively. Dr Cooper now advises international clients on IP in relation to a range of industries including, the biosciences, chemical sciences and pharmaceutical industries. Her role also extends to drafting, advising and negotiating commercial contracts, licences, joint ventures, collaborations, mergers and acquisitions especially the intellectual property and IT aspects of such corporate transactions. Dr Cooper advises start-ups, universities, spinout companies, small to medium sized enterprises and corporate clients.

You can also reach this article by using: political issues, political news, current political issues, latest political news
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Castro Consigns Cuban Concerns to Raul to Re-run Revolutionary Responsibilities
 
The Panama Canal Took Nearly 400 Years to Build
 
Israel is Still Gods Clock ?C So What Time Is It
 
Religious Nut Cases and Their Right to Free Speech?
 
Fury and Sound as GM Seeds Abound
 
Sarbanes-Oxley: The Wrong Solution To A Legitimate Problem
 
An Encouraging Moment / Pomes for the Heart
 
Osama bin Laden Type International Terrorist Attack in Egypt
 
The Doctrine of Your Church: Will It Play in Peoria?
 
"Living" Proof: We are Living in the Days of Noah
 
 
 
Home Page :> Privacy Policy :> ToS  
Copyright © 2008 www.articlecrossroad.com